Is this the truth? No. But if John McCain thinks he can go out and say the same thing about people he don't agree with when it comes to Iraq, then we have the right to wage our own baseless attacks against him.
Of course if our side does start those attacks, McCain's campaign would start crying about how we are attacking a former POW. Guess what? Our enemies don't care one way or the other if John McCain was a POW, so what will happen if he becomes President? He won't have that excuse to hide behind. So McCain and his campaign needs to stop this whole "unpatriotic" rhetoric they are using and hiding behind McCain's time as a POW. Instead come out and address the issues. If he don't like what the other side is saying then give us a good counter - not "he was a POW".
Comments
Anyway, McCain is a war criminal who massacred innocent Vietnamese men, women and children when he was a bomb pilot. Don´t say he just obeyed order, he is proud of it and are using these crimes to make a political career. The REAL heroes deserted the dirty war, or condemned the war when they get back to the US.
USA is a weird country. It is one of the few in the world where engaging in terror bombing of civilians (most vctims of the US bomb raids of North Vietnam were civilians ) is seen as an advantage in a presidential election. A candidate in a presidential election in France, who had the same record in the war in Algeria, would pray to God that the media never found it out. But in US and a few other countries (possibly Serbia, to mention one of the few) it is a merit!
You have a great blog, but I have noticed that when you want to say "Lose", as in the opposite of "Win", you instead say "Loose", which is the opposite of "Tight".
Also, I totally agree that as a line of defense, the POW background is irrelevant and tiresome.
Post new comment