The NRA Hearts Terrorists
05/04/2007 04:37 pm
Should this organization really have such an influence in our politics?
The National Rifle Association is urging the Bush administration to withdraw its support of a bill that would prohibit suspected terrorists from buying firearms.
Backed by the Justice Department, the measure would give the attorney general the discretion to block gun sales, licenses or permits to terror suspects.
In a letter this week to Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, NRA executive director Chris Cox said the bill, offered last week by Sen. Frank Lautenberg, D-N.J., "would allow arbitrary denial of Second Amendment rights based on mere 'suspicions' of a terrorist threat."
We get called "terrorist sympathizers" for complaining about torture and the removal of Habeas. What the hell is this? These people think those suspects should have guns (and yes - they are suspects). How can the Republicans defend this? So you don't get a right to a speedy trial, yet you do get the right to a gun? I missed the part where one constitutional right trumps the other.
I think the Republicans should be asked if they will denounce this stance by the NRA. If the ACLU went out and said that terrorism suspects had a right to bear arms, then they would be branded as terrorists themselves. Something is very wrong here.
Comments
NRA executive director Chris Cox said the bill . . . "would allow arbitrary denial of Second Amendment rights based on mere 'suspicions' of a terrorist threat."
Simple denunciation by parties unknown is enough to send folks to Gitmo forever.
Oh wait, those people were unarmed when they were seized and transported, so that doesn't count.
You're getting this all wrong.
The NRA has finally woken up to the 'arbitrary' (their word) nature of the war on terror. That's a GOOD THING.
Come on.....if we truly believe everything we say about how evil the Bush administration is, then we SHOULD be worried about their definition of "suspect" and whether or not they can have their guns taken away.