William Kristol

On This Day – William Kristol Gets It

Mon Nov 17, 2008 at 10:40 am
By jamie

kristol And I can’t believe I am saying that, but he appears to actually have seen what happened on Election Day and is now calling out the GOP on it:

If Republicans and conservatives don’t come to grips with what’s happened — and can’t develop an economic agenda moving forward that seems to incorporate lessons learned from what’s happened — then they could be back, politically, in 1933.

From 1933 to 1980, Republicans repeatedly failed to convince the country they were no longer the party of Herbert Hoover — the party, as it was perceived, of economic incompetence, austerity and recession (if not depression).

Only two Republicans won presidential elections in that half-century, Dwight D. Eisenhower and Richard M. Nixon. Both were able to take the White House only because we were mired down in difficult wars, in Korea and Vietnam. And Ike and Nixon were unable — they didn’t really try — to change the generally liberal course of domestic and economic policy. The G.O.P.’s fate on Capitol Hill was worse. The party controlled Congress for only 4 of those 47 years.

That’s what happens when a depression begins on your watch and when you can’t offer a coherent explanation of how and why it occurred and what you are going to do differently. That’s what happens when instead of having such an explanation, you spend decades in quarrels between pragmatic but unimaginative moderates who seek to be better tax collectors for the liberal welfare state, and principled but fanciful conservatives who hope for a wholesale rejection of that welfare state. And the fact that there were many successful Republican governors in those years didn’t much change the party’s status nationally.

(emphasis added)

The GOP seems to be laying all their hopes in some GOP Governor lifting them from the jaws of permanent minority status. Their list of stars include names like Bobby Jindal, Sarah Palin and Tim Pawlenty. But as Kristol even points out, having star  governors didn’t help the Republicans that much before.

Republicans have faces a serious blow. They risk being the party of a double header in economic depressions. The party paid big for the first one, and the possibility of another one will do only more damage to the party. We could end up seeing if our two party system of government can operate with only one party.

It's Time For John McCain To Fire His Campaign

Mon Oct 13, 2008 at 08:24 am
By jamie

Those words are from none other than William Krystol:

He has nothing to lose. His campaign is totally overmatched by Obama’s. The Obama team is well organized, flush with resources, and the candidate and the campaign are in sync. The McCain campaign, once merely problematic, is now close to being out-and-out dysfunctional. Its combination of strategic incoherence and operational incompetence has become toxic. If the race continues over the next three weeks to be a conventional one, McCain is doomed.

I don't think a presidential campaign has ever hit the restart button with only three weeks to go, but it would seal the deal on Obama winning if McCain did take this gamble. The biggest thing it would show is that McCain is a reactive person, instead of a proactive one. With the current state of America that is something we really don't need. Please let John follow the advice of his PNAC buddy on this. Hit the restart button! Give us some fun these last few weeks.

Bill Kristol, The New Jayson Blair

Mon Mar 17, 2008 at 08:48 am
By jamie

Bill Kirstol has a new hit piece in the New York Times, in which he flat out lies about Obama. There was no fact checking done at all. Will the New York Times fire him like they did Jayson Blair?

0-2

Mon Jan 14, 2008 at 06:48 pm
By jamie

It looks like Kristol was wrong on his second New York Times piece:

Kristol in his column, which hailed the success of the "surge" in Iraq, concluded with this trump card: Now the Iraqi government has agreed on de-Baathification, a key gain that proves his point and pretty much destroys the Democrats' stand.

But now at www.nytimes.com comes a kind of corrective from the paper's Solomon Moore in Baghdad. It opens:

"A day after the Iraqi Parliament passed legislation billed as the first significant political step forward in Iraq after months of deadlock, there were troubling questions — and troubling silences — about the measure’s actual effects.

I bet they are just thrilled that they hired him.

Syndicate content